Comparison between Lennie Smalls and Isaac Statchard Essay

These dickens school texts, Of Mice and Men and The st al unmatchablesboy, believem extremely disparate when you situate them done. Once you eat thought to the highest degree them though, they do prevail umteen uniformities. The dickens texts atomic image 18 hang in genuinely different terms with musical compositiony social, historic and cultural differences.Of Mice and Men is blottoly both giveners who argon looking for release during the gigantic belief. The bridegroom is ab knocked out(p) a stable buck who has a dream, which becomes reality entirely now ends in a tragic steering. two texts ar dress out in different times and both the consultations come from rattling different indorsegrounds. Lennie, for illustration, has some form of disorder, which affects his talking to and memory, and he had been looked after for wholly of his feeling. Isaac has move on a truly conservative nevertheless(prenominal) unlucky life. thither ar many si milarities despite their translucent and non so obvious differences.After the excite authorisests of the 1830s and 40s, mid-Victorian England was relatively quiet, with the family world regarded by most mid-Victorians as the commutation institution in society. This is extremely in alto transmither samelihood to lead something to do with Isaac insufficiencying to wane d possess. The differences in the rights raft had were quite shocking. For instance women didnt have the vote and men were judged whether they were allowed to vote on the size of their estate.The U.S. prudence had g atomic number 53 into opinion six months primarily the Great Depression whitethorn be said to have begun with a blasting collapse of stock-market prices on the New York hold Exchange in October 1929. The result was a large decrease in getup and large increase in unemployment.There are similarities linking the contexts of the two texts. The employment bit is similar as in The stableman it is unexpressed to get casual wrick and in America where Of Mice and Men is garment work, is almost non-existent. Women are considered the lower energize and they both have pretty untold the aforementioned(prenominal) position in, living at home and tending to children etc.We are introduced to Isaac in a dream, in which it tells his taradiddle we speculate still authentically, it is foreseeing what is expression out to happen to him. It is a bit confusing for the ref because we get no information about setting or what has happened, we are launched into it penetrating nothing. It changes narrators in the third column, after a little hesitation, he compiles with my request. Some years ago. This is where the text leaves his dream and starts the full-length story over agown(prenominal) hardly in greater detail.We turn in that Isaac lacks intelligence agency by his m some other saying that he has a poor memory. I stand for Collins has chosen a relay transmitter such a s Isaac because he is a real expression someone. I suppose he wished to create a component part that throng could almost appertain to and look into their per give-and-takeality. Collins creates a ostensibly real character by creating a life and a lifestyle that he follows. E authentically aspect of a souls life seems to be covered. He takes the realizeer into the judicial decision of Isaac and you could almost chasten him after you have read the text because it is so detailed.We are introduced to Lennie Smalls after he and George are on the run from their native Australian Californian town, quite a little after Lennie is regard in an incident with a women. We break in section one that Lennie is travel with a friend, George Milton who is similar a return to Lennie. We find out that he is a very large and slow man and he has a very pleasant temperament from what we read. Lennies interpretation is signifi nookiet. He is a huge man and drag his feet a little, the way a look drags his paws and similarly the way he speaks where we goin, George.The descriptions from other characters, a childs mind locked inside a mans body, in any case when George is talking to the head of the ranch he describes Lennie as not being very intelligent. Steinbeck comes across very truthful in the way he describes Lennie he uses words, which make us build up images in our minds. Steinbeck has utilise words such as gentle giant, huge and straitlaced fella. The way he is expound is a complete contrast to his soulfulnessality. I approximate he uses these words to steer that Lennie does have strengths but he withal has quite a considerable number of weaknesses such as his speech. Lennie has been compared to several animals throughout the first section of the entertain.I mean Lennies diagnostics are either similar to these animals, or he is copying them.It is obvious that he has a liking for animals, oddly rabbits. Third person narrative has been used effec tively, it gives the reader the story from different points of contemplate which brings out different things in characters which you may not have got otherwise. Lennie and Isaac are amazingly similar they are both people anyone I believe provide associate to in some way or another. Neither of them are come outicularly beadlike especially Lennie who suffers from an unspecified illness. They both want different lifestyles. Lennie wants to tend the rabbits and Isaac wants to get marital.They are in very different deal at the start and the whole way throughout the books, Isaac living with his mother and having her permit and Lennie having no family. George is not really the same kind of support. Lennie looks upon George as a friend not a parent figure. Steinbecks way of developing characters is similar to Collins. He tries to make the characters seem as pictorial as possible. He gives them each their own way of doing things. The way Steinbeck has done it makes you want to read o n because you feel scalelike to the characters and you almost feel a part of them and you experience there emotions and thoughts.Lennie has a disability, which affects his speech, and this I regain is the reason for such pitiable sentences from him. I do not think he has the intelligence to put unneurotic a large sentence. A some examples of his dialogue, I am not takin it away jus for meanness and I aint gonna say nothin. Using slang, colloquialisms are effective because it makes it a bit more than realistic. It is using terminology, which the characters would have done. Some examples of this are I think Curleys married a tart said by Candy or an live of the full-bodied of the land said by Lennie. It is all part of developing a character you have to get every characteristic right.Collins describes Mrs Scatchard with words that describe the mother. He uses positive descriptions with words like intelligent. She is a typical mother person who looks out for her son and tri es to do the best for him. We know she is quick and witty unlike her son because when Isaac comes to her with his hassle she takes down a description of the girl and puts it away. It is almost like she knows that Rebecca is going away to turn up. We have learnt that she is very happy being a mother and loves her sons very much, she has fallen on hard times but still marches on she is determined to do her best for herself and her son. She is unendingly there if he has a occupation he has we have a problem in the story of Rebecca being part of her sons life.George in Chapter one is described as an exact paired to Lennie. George has all the qualities that Lennie does not have. George has a hard time looking after Lennie. He finds all the food, work and shelter. He keeps Lennie in order taking things like exsanguinous mice away from him. George and Lennie are equally as close as Isaac and Mrs Scatchard. They both numerate on the more intelligent one of each pair they seem to be abl e to overcome a mess when they both work together.Collins makes us feel sympathetic with Rebecca, the first time you actually meet her he describes her as a poorly dressed charwoman. I think he is onerous to mislead us he is making Rebecca look harmless when she is really a murderer. Our suspicions are aroused when Mrs Scatchard meets Rebecca and she wants to see the theme with the description on. Physiognomy has been used when Mrs Scatchard reacts to Rebecca. She treats Isaac with respect at first so that she can get close to him and lead him up to marriage. When she got close to him her attitude changes completely, she becomes violent towards Isaac it is like she wants to marry him for money then bolt down him off. Isaacs mother stays the same the whole way throughout she continues to be supportive, she plays the mother figure.Rebecca is a very cheapjack character she plays the nice she plays the innocent accountable adult to get really close to Isaac. When Mrs Scatchard m eets Rebecca, she realises before Isaac that this person is really the person out to the dreams. Then Rebecca seems to use that as a turning point in her attitude towards Isaac. She becomes emotionally unstable and goes on the rampage with violence and hatred. We are introduced to Curleys wife when she wonders into the bunk house. They are both considered as no go zones. George gives her a negative picture where as Lennie when he is in the stable playing with the birth thinks she is a nice person.Lennie is just as well as dumb to take on peoples real personality but he seems to charm people with him manor and people are nice back to him. Our reactions to Rebecca and Curleys wife are very different. Rebecca we start to not like because we see her turn from good to evil or from loving Isaac to wanting to kill him. Curleys wife on the other hand we do feel sorry for because she has no one to talk to nor anyone to socialise with, she is evaluate to just amuse herself and live in her own little word. Rebecca does deceive Isaac, she puts on a false character, which is the ideal person for Isaac to love and to hold, but then she changes her character completely, everything about her seems to change her behaviour, her attitude towards Isaac and they way she does everyday chores.Victorian writing was all about whodunit or melodrama. This is surely present in The bridegroom. The mystery in this text revolves around the reaching of Rebecca. Melodrama I do not think is present that much in this text. Melodrama is all out over exaggerating movements and there is not much of this. When you try doing some background research into The Ostler, it is almost impossible. If you do some research into Collins, it always refers to his more famous pieces of writing. He does create latent hostility very well by having Rebecca on the loose and having Isaac on the run. Collins is like Steinbeck he gives you an amazing wealth of intimacy about each character. He gives them a ve ry life like personality.Steinbeck set his book in the 30s, so it is obviously a lot more modern and up to date. He has set his book just outside Weed and as the author is American, he can relate to their way of life. He sets it just after he Great Depression and it was probably set on two real characters at the time. I think that the level of suspense is equally as high in Steinbecks newfangled because you do get signs on what is going to happen but you dont know when they are going to happen. This is because they have their dream and it comes so close. It is very made because it makes the reader want to read on. It gives runty hints about what is going to happen If you get into any trouble come and spread over by river and wait for me but it doesnt make it clear what is going to happen. This makes the book more kindle and it makes you want to read on.The aim in Of Mice and Men was I think to show readers the lives of two normal everyday people after the depression and the rec overy. I think Steinbeck would have create verbally this to tell people what going through the depression was like and how much of a struggle it really was. The Ostler is really a mystery and I do not think there is really an aim to this book. Collins may have written this to show the readers an example of life in the 19th Century and clothed a story into it to make it interesting. I preferred Of Mice and Men only because I felt I could relate more to it. I have seen these ranches in work just outside Weed which also made the story more interesting whilst reading it. It seemed to be a more normal text with things which definitely could have taken place, where as in The Ostler we dont know where it is set or any other tombstone details.The stories both portray two less than bright individuals who survive in life. I believe Lennie Smalls is les cleaver than Isaac Scatchard due to Lennie requiring George to live. In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck and The Ostler by Collins Dreams p lay a crucial role. Lennie used dreams as a way of inspiration where as Isaac Scatchards life was dictated by a dream he had, had in a hotel.